Posts Tagged ‘James Tripp’

As you may have noticed, the ‘tag-line’ for Hypnosis Without Trance is “No ‘Sleep’, No ‘Eyes Closed’, No ‘Deeper & Deeper’…” I love this tag-line, but I have a confession to make – it is not strictly true!

No ‘sleep’… true! No ‘eyes closed…’ mostly true, but I do use eye-closure as part of my set up for negative hallucination. No ‘deeper & deeper’?

Well, ‘depth’ and going ‘into’ are great metaphors, and as a hypnotist I never would want to pass up on a functionally useful metaphor. BUT… what I would like to suggest is that you use them with a little more creativity than most hypnotists do! Because when you do, you can get some REALLY POWERFUL RESULTS!!!

The video will explain all! And please leave your comments here on the blog!

Happy Hypnotising

James Tripp

P.S.

I got a great endorsement from the incredible Jörgen Rasmussen (Provocative Hypnosis) at the Change | Phenomena Conference in London on September 4th:

“I want to thank James Tripp. I’ve never endorsed a hypnosis product before, but I think his is really good.” Jörgen Rasmussen

If you haven’t got the set, and you want to find out what Jörgen is talking about, please GO HERE NOW to find out more.

Hi All…

Just a quick last minute reminder that this Saturday (4th September) is the Change | Phenomena hypnosis and hypnotherapy conference in London. I say reminder, but I for some this could be the first the know of it!

The speakers include:

Anthony Jacquin
Freddy Jacquin
Kev Sheldrake
Jorgen Rasmussen
James Brown…

…and me!

And I must say it is most gratifying to be sharing a stage (and Q&A panel) with such fine pedigree hypnotists!

tho find out more, visit: www.changephenomena.com

I say more in the vid below, so you may like to take a look!

All te very best,

James

The perfect hypnotist, that mythical figure, is able to hypnotise anybody, anytime, anywhere – but can we even get close?

This post takes the form of a question (posed in the comments section of the about page on this blog) and an answer.  Not the answer… but an answer.

Here it goes…

Hi James,

As an expert (in my opinion) I would LOVE your opinion on this short video: http://learn-hypnosis.com/blog/?p=23
It is a video from Jonathan Chase explaining that only 80% of the people can be hypnotized. Period.

Do you agree with this James?

Thanks a lot up ahead!

Rudy
Holland

Hi Rudy

That’s not a bad rule of thumb (for most good hypnotists) from Jon… but it isn’t necessarily that simple! I believe that everyone can experience hypnosis and does everyday. By this I mean if you take the definition “hypnosis is the use of communication to alter a person’s perceived reality” (which is close enough to my working definition), hypnosis is happening all the time. But this general, everyday hypnosis only relates to what I would call ‘soft phenomena’ – simple changes in state and thinking.

To get ‘hard phenomena’ (catalepsy, hallucination etc.) you need to distort reality much more, when you do this, people notice it happening and tend to correct in order to reinstate reality as they know it.

So you need to set frames that will explain the distortion, and you need to get them to ‘buy in’ to those frames (believe them 100% or close to 100%). Now, from a psychological perspective, some people are habituated to scepticism, which means that it is hard work to get them to buy into the frames you set. THIS IS KEY!

The perfect hypnotist is skilled enough to get ANYONE to ‘buy in’ to the operating frames… but this hypnotist doesn’t exist!

It’s a bit like Martial Arts – even the best of the best cannot beat everyone on the planet (because there will be those who surprise them with something they were not equipped for, or some contextual element will make difference… or they will be having an off day).

The more experience you have in hypnosis, the higher the percent of people you meet you can hypnotise. 80% is a good level! Most hypnotists that good (and this will include Jon, who is excellent) will learn to recognise the percentage that they are going to struggle with, and carefully avoid them (thus engineering for themselves a close to 100% success rate).

For me, the ongoing fascination with hypnosis is learning more and more about how people respond (especially those in the tough 20%) so as to start cutting into that percentage and move towards the ‘holy grail’ of being able to hypnotise ABSOLUTELY ANYONE.

This is where the HWT No-Fail material (which is being ‘pre-launced’ today) comes from – it’s for dealing with that tough percentage that just aren’t going to plan. This doesn’t mean that you are going to get ‘invisibility’ with everyone you work with, but taken in combination with good general hypnotic skills, you can get some category hypnotic phenomena from almost anyone, and for those who you can’t (at that time), you can exit the process on your terms and with your credibility intact.

Please be clear that this is my take on things based in my experience, and that Jon Chase and I have very different worldview from each other when it comes to these things (and that may even be an understatement!).

For me, the downside of the 80/20 rule in this context is that if you write off 20% as unhypnotisable, you place a psychological barrier in the way of developing your skills to tackle that tough 20%.

If the Wright brothers were hypnotists, I wonder how they would have responded to being told that %20 of people are unhypnotisable?

All the very best

James

P.S.  the No-Fail Protocol DVD’s will be going on a limited Pre-Launch later on today.

Hi Folks

I have a quick video here explaining how adjusting your subject/clients position and posture is so much more powerful than simply building compliance.  This little tip really is gold!

P.S. I mention the Hypnosis Without Trance, Hypnosis Mastery Programme at the end of the video! Well, here’s an email I got today from Michael Skirving (www.michaelskirving.co.uk) who bought his copy of the programme on the 17th of June (about 3 weeks ago). Here’s what michael said:

“This material has taught me more about Hypnosis than my previous 20 years in Psychology and 4 years as a practicing Hypnotherapist.  Hypnotherapists are sometimes very scathing of this stuff,  perhaps scared at what they might accomplish!  This material should be a standard requirement for ANY Hypnotist wanting to bring about real change work.  Everything is demonstrated without anything held back and explained in finest detail,  to satisfy all learning styles.  If you don’t learn this stuff you will be left behind!

Thank you Michael!

Please do check out the order page for more details: http://www.hypnosiswithouttrance.com/hypnosis_without_trance_homestudy.htm

MINOR RANT ALERT!

O.K, so I’m the Hypnosis Without Trance guy, which means…

Many people keep telling me that I am wrong in asserting that hypnosis is not about a special state, and more about how a persons beliefs and everyday cognitive processes are engaged. And what is more, they say, they can prove it!

They tell me that research with fMRI equipment shows an alteration of neurological patterns (see http://www.webmd.com/brain/news/20050627/what-hypnosis-does-to-brain), so therefore trance must the real mechanism behind hypnosis.

Excuse me?!?!

How does that logic work?

Well, apparently the fMRI shows an altered state, therefore hypnosis must be an altered state! Simple!

Hmmm….

Now I’ll admit that I haven’t done the research on this (no one will fund me), but I am willing to bet that if you hooked someone up to fMRI and gave them a donut to eat, the fMRI machine would record a shift in brain activity as they ate it, so by the same logic…

Donut eating is an altered state! That is what it is! That is what makes it work!

Donut eating is trance!

So as long as you deepen enough, they will be eating that donut.

I’m glad that has been cleared up and I can formally dismount my soapbox.

Stay Frosty

James

P.S. Please do feel free to post your comments on this, especially if you disagree!

P.P.S. If there are any hypnosis questions that you would like answered, or things that you would like to know more about, please either leave a comment or email me and I will endeavor to give you my take on it right here on the blog!

Did I ever say how I first got into hypnosis and NLP?

Well, I would love to tell a tale of intrigue  and excitement, but the truth is that I saw Derren Brown on the Jonathan Ross show in 2002 and he totally blew my mind. So I got straight on the internet and googled for what he was doing, then went and got books!

Among the first books I got were Introducing NLP by Seymore & O’Conner, and 13 Steps to Mentalism by Tony Corinda – two very different books which started me on two very different (but closely related) paths. These days I don’t perform much mentalism as I have concentrated on the more ‘serious’ side of things (I totally love doing changework and teaching hypnosis, and can’t get enough of learning new things), but occasionally…

This bit of video was taken at the recent No-Fail Protocol training. The truth is it wasn’t really relevant to the content of the day, but there were cameras running, so I couldn’t resist. Here is what it is about:

Have you ever had the experience of knowing something that you really shouldn’t have known?

Maybe you just had a feeling about it, or maybe it was something more tangible than that.

What you are about to see is based in the concept that there is intangible information encoded on many levels within our environment – knowledge that we have access to outside of consciousness and that we can gain access to this information through hypnotically eliciting ‘somatic metaphor’.

This is…

Spaces, Places and Unconscious Knowledge.

And PLEASE DO LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS HERE ON THE BLOG! Thank You!

This is an excellent and informative article written by Niy Mahmout about his experiences in applying Hypnosis Without Trance since attending the No-fail Protocol weekend and the Live in London workshops.

Niy has really taken the stuff on and is applying it creatively, so although the article was written for the Hypnosis Without Trance Groupsite, I thought that it would be useful for people following the blog to read too (much of the stuff referenced has been discussed here on the blog). Here are Niy’s words:

It’s been 4 weeks since the excellent HWT and NFP seminars and I’ve tested the protocol on 7 people and had 2 where no phenomena occurred and 5 where it did. I consider all 7 to be successful in teaching me something important, in this and other hypnotic processes.

First is that to be sure of ‘success’ then work on getting the other person to engage in the process. James emphasized this in his seminars and his videos. My first failure taught me how important this is. What is said or done needs to be geared towards obtaining engagement in a process. What gets people engaged in a process? Well, examples could be because they feel there’s some benefit to them; they’re interested to learn something; think it might be fun; interested in finding out what you’ve learned or a multitude of other things. Without this all the words that you say may continue to be just words.

One of my reasons for attending the HWT seminar was to see if it can be usefully adapted for pain management. I had an opportunity last week to ‘experiment’ on a friend who has a chronic knee condition. I attempted to hypnotise him a year ago using a relaxation style induction which he decided wasn’t working and continued with his pills. This saddened me at the time, for him and for me because I didn’t have the skills necessary to manage what was happening. Perhaps there should be more taught about what to do when things don’t go according to the plans as taught in workshops. (During his 2 seminars James covered this situation very well and it all made sense to me and hopefully to all who attended).

Coming back to my friend, the lead up was a chat about a 2 mind model that I learned; conscious/unconscious, internal/external. He piped in with yin and yang and was inputting his own interesting views. He was participating so he was involved or engaged.

I asked if he would like to take part in an interesting experiment where he’d learn more about this 2 mind model. He agreed but I noticed a slight withdrawal, but I knew that he’d get back on track because he did seem genuinely interested..

I started the process as we’d practised at the seminar until I asked him to test whether the fingers or palm were more stuck. He replied fingers but the movements seemed a bit too easy so rather than continue, I took a step back and asked him to imagine that strong glue again and tell me whether he was imagining a sticky type or a hard superglue type. His reply was sticky/tacky, so I asked him to imagine that sticky/tacky glue setting, getting more and more sticky as it set more and that when he could imagine this to test his fingers and palm and to notice in which the glue had set most. The way he struggled with his fingers told me the answer before his lips moved. I was then happy to proceed because I felt confident in his engagement in the process, which was the reason for taking that step back.
(James encouraged us to use language like ‘just allow your-self to be fully absorbed/involved/engaged’ and I have used these phrases with success, but perhaps using their own words or phrases just adds something to the process. If you hear them talk about being engrossed in something then engrossed is what to use. If they say that they’re glued to the box when they’re watching footy, then assume you’ve landed on your feet for the hand-stuck process, lol.

Anyway, all the phenomena we practised producing happened, including name amnesia, whilst he was still stuck to the seat. I then instructed him that as his name returned, his focus could move to the knee and to imagine the inflammation there having a colour and shape. It was red and round. I asked him to notice how bright the red was and whether round was a ball/disk shape and what size it was. Finally, I took the ball and moved it away slowly and told him to notice what happens as the ball moves further away and appears smaller and dimmer. The results were remarkable for both of us. I moved the ball further and nearer until he managed to do it himself. I explained that pain is subjective and he could choose the level that he needed to remind him of his condition.

He called me 2 days later to say that he’d been practising moving the ball and that he was amazed.

So yes, James HWT protocol can work with pain management and probably a host of other phenomena. As he said, “be creative with it”.

Some folks will say that this is nothing new as all I’d done is eyes open hypnosis with some NLP techniques like submodalities included, to produce a ideomotor response. People with language pattern skills can reframe these things anyway they want. But the way it quickly produces a strong phenomena acts as a far greater convincer and belief change than say, eyes-lock or finger magnets and the whole approach of checks and balances ensures a high success rate. Its also extremely practical as it can be used almost anywhere and people are far more willing to go along with you if their eyes are open and they’re aware of their involvement with what’s going on. Finally, for me at least, its fun.

I’m re-reading Monsters and Magical Sticks by Steven Heller & Terry Steele which is a wonderful book and will certainly increase my understanding of input and output systems and sensory acuity.
James also recommends learning clean language and cold reading and it would be great if anyone on the HWT group has any knowledge and ideas about how all these can compliment each other.

Thanks for taking the time to read this long write-up of one of my experiences with this method and please do take the time to write your own as I genuinely want to know.

I would love to have your comments on this, and I’m sure Niy would love to get your feedback too, so please do give us your comments!

All the very best

James

Hi Y’all

SOME NEW VIDEOS! (Below)

These videos are not going to be for everyone, because they are about HWT as it applies to Hypnotherapy (I have decided to use the term “hypnotherapy” for convenience, although personally I don’t like the whole ‘therapy’ frame, and am more of a ‘changework’ guy).

I have had a lot of people asking me about Hypnotherapy applications for HWT, with many of those asking if it has any ‘therapeutic’ applications.  The short answer is ‘YES’!!! In fact, although I am thought of by many as a ‘street hypnosis’ guy, my primary profession is changework and Hypnosis (Without Trance) is a major tool.

If you are going to watch these videos, please watch both! The content is probably richer in the second, but the first is there to set it up.

I do hope that people find them useful, and if you do, please do leave a comment!

Enjoy

P.S. I was a little bit grumpy when I started recording this vid, so forgive me if I am not my usual jolly self! 😉

I have had a lot of people write to me recently asking about therapeutic and changework applications for Hypnosis Without Trance, and have recorded a video on the subject which I will be releasing soon in 2 parts.  One particularly interesting email came from a chap who had recently bought the Hypnosis Mastery Programme and used a modification of the HWT Name Amnesia pattern as part of an intervention for pain control. It was such a creative application that I decided that people would like to know about it, so here is the relevant portion of that email:

“I watched your demonstration on your site with a client having the experience of forgetting his name and utilised your approach (in a very rough and ready way) with my sister to help her with a profoundly debilitating medical condition. She has suffered from migraine attacks so extreme that she has been hospitalised on numerous occasions. She has been unable to work for some years now.

During the initial stages of a developing migraine attach I asked her to describe her experience. She described the various sites of excruciating pain but commented several times that she just knew the pain was going to get worse.

I flashed back to your demo and asked her where about she experienced this ‘knowing that the migraine was going to get worse.’ She said it was a voice just behind her eyes. I reached over and said ‘just imagine this… I’m moving that voice…follow my hand…I’m moving that voice…it’s outside now (I moved my hand at a moderate speed away from her and indicated the voice was travelling further and further way.)…it’s moving further and further away…watching it go to the horizon…it’s gone NOW…it’s gone.’

My sister blinked rapidly and I asked her to notice the difference in her experience now. She said there was an instant reduction in pain dropping by 40%! We were then able to utilise some NLP processes to help further but the greatest and most significant change she reported was that once the voice had stopped she was free to engage with her experience without the sense of pending escalating panic that her conditions was going to get dramatically worse. This description seemed to fit well with your notion of hypnotic loops.

Without the hypnotic loop running the pain and other symptoms became fascinating to her and the more she paid attention to the nature of the experience the more the pain ‘smoothed out.’ It was not so much that the pain went away but more that the labels she had attributed to certain sensations weren’t available to her. The more she became fascinated by the sensations the more the experience became less intense.

So, the results, instead of having an excruciatingly traumatic night at A&E being pumped full of morphine, after several hours, she fell asleep. The migraine was dramatically reduced in intensity and only lasted 1 1/2 day. Usually such intense attacks would last 5 to 6 days. This is unheard of despite utilising every NLP process I could find in my 10 year study of the subject… Thanks!”

As I say, I will be bringing you more soon concerning therapeutic applications, but until then…

All the very best

James

P.S. Additional news is that the Hypnosis Mastery Programme is now available in NTSC as well as PAL formats.

This clip was taken at the recent ‘No-Fail Protocol’ workshop in April 2010. It is a classic ‘Name Amnesia’ piece, but what is different here is that I am using ideomotor phenomena to set it up (ideomotoer to set up ideocognitive).

The reason for this choice was that this volunteer had already shown great competence in ideomotor phenomena, so it made good sense to utilise this competence in setting up the ‘amnesia’.

I need to say something about why this kind of amnesia is not really amnesia at all, but I’ll save that for the ext post.

Enjoy the vid!

I’d like to tip the HMI for the finger spreading idea (if you haven’t checked out their free hypnosis course, it is well worth doing so).